Thanks to OGA research team member and Vermont native Paul Bean for this OP/ED.
Here in Vermont we are experiencing historic catastrophic flooding, even worse than Tropical Storm Irene.
The question MUST be asked: how did this happen?
We all know the rain has been unusually frequent this summer causing the ground to be completely saturated before this even began. But how, in less than 24 hours did the state of Vermont get an entire summer’s worth of Rain? How could we have a random, out-of-the-blue unnamed Storm that is worse than Irene? Some are saying “it’s climate change.”
Perhaps it is…
But if you are like me and do not subscribe to the international “scientific” agenda claiming that it’s purely being caused by carbon emissions, could this really be just the “natural cycles of the earth?”
Short and sweet, no.
Or at least I do not believe that either.
This is going to be a tough and strange conversation. I am not exactly claiming that this is exactly what happened but from what I’ve gathered, other people are asking the same questions. I am simply theorizing based on what I know to be true about weather modification and the history of powerful governments using the weather as a weapon.
“Operation Sober Popeye,” was the covert military weather modification program to “make mud, not war” during the Vietnam Conflict: Popeye took place from 1967 to 1972, aimed to enhance rainfall over targeted areas in Southeast Asia, specifically the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
Under Operation Popeye, the U.S. military employed cloud-seeding techniques to artificially “make it rain” over the targeted region. Cloud-seeding involves dispersing chemical agents, such as silver iodide, into clouds to stimulate precipitation (AKA Chemtrails).
The intention was to extend the monsoon season, increase rainfall, and create muddy and impassable conditions along the supply routes used by the North Vietnamese. The operation was conducted by the U.S. Air Force’s 54th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron, based in Thailand.
Operation Popeye remained classified until its exposure by investigative journalists and the congressional following hearings in 1971. The operation faced widespread criticism and condemnation for its environmental and humanitarian implications. The use of weather modification as a military tactic raised concerns about the potential weaponization of weather and the long-term ecological impact.
In response to public outcry and growing international pressure, the United States officially ended Operation Popeye in March 1972. In the same year, an international treaty known as the Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD) was adopted, prohibiting the use of weather modification techniques for hostile purposes.
Gordon MacDonald, who served on the National Science Foundation’s Advisory Panel for Weather Modification from 1964 to 1967, had warned that ENMOD or environmental warfare “could damage an adversary without revealing the aggressor’s intent” and that “applying such techniques of war under cover of nature’s irregularities presents a disquieting prospect.
MacDonald added that a secretly waged weather war “need never be declared or even known by the affected populations. It could go on for years with only the country’s [aggressor’s] security forces involved being aware of it” (emphasis added), as the complex randomness of the weather makes accusations of aggression plausibly deniable. (sound familiar)?
Gordon MacDonald is no dummy either. A Graduate of Harvard, a long-time member of the elite JASON advisory group of scientists. He also served on the original Presidential Council on Environmental Quality (1970–1972). President Nixon was quoted at the time, “I have three members of the Harvard class of 1950 on my staff, all summa cum laude.” He was talking about Henry Kissinger, James Schlesinger, and MacDonald. MacDonald was also one of the first people to address the concern of global warming from fossil-fuel combustion and carbon emissions.
Operation Popeye is just one example of we humans controlling the weather. We even see headlines from our mainstream press talking about other countries and their use of weather manipulation. In the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and China it is common knowledge among their citizens that their Government is controlling the weather.
Back to the situation here at home. Some of you might be wondering: are you implying that the United States Government would actually do harm to their own citizens in such a way? Yes, I do think they would. It is becoming increasingly clear to many Americans that globalist interests will stop at nothing to forward their agenda. From false flags, to the plandemic, to murdering a sitting President in broad daylight… They will literally stop at nothing.
But why Vermont?
That is a fair question. Why would Globalist powers have interest in manufacturing a “natural” catastrophe in the second smallest state in the country?
It is simple. Vermont is known to lead the country in a lot of things. We are often the “first” to do something, before anyone else. We were the first to abolish slavery (before we even joined the US), we were the first to join the original 13 colonies. We were the first to enshrine abortion rights into our constitution. The first state to pass same-sex civil union legislation. The first state in the country to change its medically assisted suicide law to allow terminally ill people from out of state to take advantage of it to end their lives…the first state in the country to require foods made with genetically modified ingredients… the list goes on.
Vermont, often will follow the lead of California OR be the first to do it.
So what is my point?
This unprecedented storm will 100% be used as an example as to why we as a State need to pass more legislation with the goal to mitigate climate change. Will we follow behind the burning state of California and go to their extremes?
Or will we take the lead and go even further?
Vermont also happens to be the perfect target because take a look at how we responded to Covid. More than 80% of the population was unwilling to question the narrative at all. People here are too distracted with the woke agenda. They will never look to the skies and ask questions. If the TV says it’s “climate change” it must be climate change! They would never lie?! Right?! It is not a state of Free-thinkers (at least entirely).
Given the makeup of the State Legislature, I am sure they will do pretty much whatever they want, considering the fact that they pretty much do anyway. Probably the biggest conversation during the last legislative session was the so-called “Affordable Heat Act.” A piece of policy that would punish fuel dealers and ultimately citizens for heating their homes with oil/ gas, and “reward” those using electric heat pumps.
So back to the question, why Vermont? I’ve been wondering this for a while: why is Vermont so liberal? How did this happen? Well, because it is just small enough and takes very little investment into politics to influence legislation.
This state is used like an experiment for everything the UN wants to implement along with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and The World Economic Forum.
They bully the little state of Vermont, shove legislation down our throat, use us as a test, and then eventually try to implement their programs elsewhere.
Now look. I am not 100% claiming this storm was caused by Geoengineering. However, something certain does not seem right about this. I do not yet have evidence that this was deliberate.
And to the people wondering “how would they even be able to do that without people noticing, Paul? That is completely insane.”
I really do not blame you for feeling that way, because it is insane.
I have been studying the subject of climate engineering and weather modification for 4 years. I interned with a group while at the University of Vermont called Our Geoengineering Age which was dedicated to exploring and exposing the subject to the public. I implore you to check out our website (link below) and do some more research for yourself on this subject. We have 33+ peer reviewed scientific essays and articles.
To this day, after all of the evidence I’ve reviewed and even geoengineering activity I have seen with my own eyes I still second guess myself because, yeah, it’s insane.
However with what I’ve learned since 2020 about this Government and Globalist powers, I really would not put anything past them anymore.
Take this into account too: During the implementation of the Manhattan Project and the creation of the Atomic Bomb The President of the United States Harry Truman did not know what the project actually was. Similarly, Richard Nixon was not even aware of Operation Popeye during the Vietnam Conflict, so I highly doubt many even in the highest level of Government would know anything about this today.
And at the State level Government? I am sure that anyone who knows me would call me completely insane for expressing these thoughts and genuinely know nothing about anything like this. Peter Welch, Bernie Sanders, Phil Scott, my guess is they are completely unaware or their hands are too tied to say or do anything.
Ultimately, many are already arguing that we should be Geoengineering to mitigate climate change. For example, Environmentalist Bill McKibben, a Vermonter, and founder of 350. org, an Environmental Non-Profit recently wrote an article in the New Yorker explaining how our “Climate Crisis” is getting so bad that we unfortunately are “inching towards it” weather control as a last ditch effort.
He explains “Solar Radiation Management,” a form of climate modification (a bit different from weather modification in terms of scale) where essentially the goal is to “dim the sun” by spraying aerosolized sulfur particles into the atmosphere and to do this at a global scale. He explains the droughts and other environmental issues in Asia and UAE. He even mentions the weather modification programs happening in China.
I argue it is already going on and Bill’s article is nothing but a soft disclosure of what’s been going on for decades. When their manufactured climate events get so bad, they will literally have us begging them to control the weather.
At the end of the day, whether this is the case or not in this instance, we have been experimenting with the weather since the early 1960s and there is plenty of evidence thereof.
In the 1960s it seemed like anything was possible. The Technological Revolution, The Space Race. Satellites, The moon landing.
We could overcome absolutely anything. At least that’s the impression I have from what I heard from my Grandparents. People were hopeful about their country. Multiple Presidents of the United States had weather control as part of their stated goals along with going to the moon, for example JFK.
As President Lyndon Baines Johnson once said: “He who controls the weather, will control the world.”
I will finish this by saying, we Vermonters do not consent! End geoengineering forever! I am open to criticism and hoping for any and all feedback. Thanks!
twitter: @pbeanVT; Instagram: pbean802
The author is a Northfield, Vermont native and current resident and 2022 candidate for Vermont Senate.